Why is rape Rape? A question that i had been trying to resolve for quite some time, but the solution to which seemed quite elusive to the kind of reasoning i was following. No, It was not a "guilty until proven innocent" scenario. I was not trying to find some reason to implicate someone whom the public has already lynched. I was willing to accept rape as natural turn of events if my reasoning took me to that end. But then it came to me, a clarity of vison. And the verdict is...'guilty as charged'. String him up from the nearest tree. Die you cretin Die!
I started...as always..from the absence of rape in the animal kingdom. No lion forces himself on a lioness because he knows for sure that his balls would be strung across the nearest bush. On the other hand when the strongest dude with the richest mane walks down and sniffs the nether side of his choice she is one welcoming bitch...why? survival of the fittest silly!!
This is the concept that turns on its head once we get into human 'society.' In what can only be termed as a gendercide or gender cleansing, the female of the species was wiped out and replaced by..women.
Now..all ye people out there who have grown used to understanding themselves as women dont get me wrong here...I am only saying that there is much more to you than you have been allowed think of yourselves as. You have been deceived by the male populace and brain-washed members of your own species into thinking that you dont have the one thing that makes life worth living...choice. Oh well...yes, the bra-burning lot created the modern-age woman who makes her own 'choice.' The woman who 'chooses' to work hard so that she can drive a car instead of travelling by bus and get pinched in the ass. The woman who 'chooses' divorce cos her husband went and screwed her best friend (lucky bastard!). That is not choice my dears...that is just a higher level of deception. The same deception that makes you live a life-style that deteriorates you physically and makes you mentally sub-serviant. One and a half times the muscular strength, my ass. Say that to a bull-elephant trying to get on top of an uninviting female... there will be blood my dear friends; high chance it will be the fore-skin rather than the hymen. Real choice is when a male knows that it is not worth loosing his balls trying to screw a female who is not exactly looking for sex, rather than any fancy notion of "gentlemen respecting a womans integrity and her personal space."
Disclaimer - This is no grand attempt to change the system. No way there is going to be a grand 'back to nature' revolution saving the femaler gender. Just letting everybody know that this is the way things are and we are pretty much screwed till the giant people-eating cockroaches come from Ursula Minor and eat all the people.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
15 comments:
"there will be blood my dear friends"..want you 'lucky bastards' to realise that..its just the society and the patriarchy and the MCP's who gave the feel that women are wasted creatures..
Well, well, well. What a sensitive commentary on a sensitive issue.
One of the problems with flippant ramblings of this kind is that we poor misguided women, who haven't benefited from mind-moulding by the great Machiavelli, might find it difficult to figure out what exactly the point of this post is. But then, there might easily be no point. This might be the great Machiavelli's idea of a joke. For all I know, some people might actually find this post funny.
@ann..Exactly..you got the point i was trying to make
@aparna...Yes, i realise the trouble with the way the idea is expressed..but in fact it is the most serious of my posts, and it will take a bit of outside the system thinking to realise the seriousness of it...otherwise, for those entrenched in society, it will be as you say 'flippant'
@machiavelli. O Guru, wilt thou condescend to explain thy message to this unfortunate who is "entrenched in society" and thus is blinded to the marvels of "out-of-the-box" thinking?
For instance, what "choice" would you advocate to the woman whose husband is cheating on her? And what "choice" is open to the woman who is facing rape by a man physically superior to her in strength? I ask merely because the argument of your post (which I still haven't grasped) seems to hinge so much on the word "choice".
This comment is not so much a response to your post as to your follow-up comment. An old friend of my father's whom I respect a lot, an old Physics professor, once told me, "If a head knocks against a book and a hollow sound is heard, it's not always the head which is empty." Not that I mean my head is overflowing with the little grey cells and therefore soundproof, but ... think about it.
@aparna..let us stick to the "which I still haven't grasped" reasoning rather than the head and the book reasoning..you are thinking very much from within the perimeter of society...From the point from which i am speaking marriage itself is a fabrication; then whats the need to speak about 'cheating'(which by the way is something the male of the species is built to do; spread his seed as far and wide as possible). And the real choice of which i speak is the womans ability to kick the male out once he has done his deed. And about physical superiority..that was what the whole point i was trying to make with the "One and a half times the muscular strength my ass" statement. That a womans physical inferiority is the result of the way in which society has brought her up..if there were the way i imagine it...well, that what the whole "bull elephant trying to..." episode is about
And when you ask me for what "choice" i will give the woman in these situations now that we r in the society that we are...read disclaimer
The 'might-have-been' is one thing. Unfortunately, we have to live in the 'here-and-now'. What's the point of saying 'women were physically strong in 2000 BC before the patriarchal society subjugated them' to a woman who is being raped in 2000 AD? A woman who is being propositioned has a choice; a woman who is about to be raped has none. Whereas a man who is about to rape a woman has the ability to restrain himself and the choice to exert it. Unfortunately, in the human kingdom, such a choice is not likely to be based on physical fear.
And your disclaimer, if you'll pardon the language, smacks of the impotent resignation of the intellectual who folds his arms and shakes his head at day-to-day realities and leaves their solution to giant cockroaches from Ursula Minor.
enjoyed the description of the handsome male lion...
completely agree with the differences drawn out between the 'human' and the 'animal' world
but once the differences are already in place, it surely is difficult to weed those imposters out
also, my editorial eye has spotted an obvious and an intended (?) error :)
@ aparna: the cockroaches from Ursula Minor is a metaphor for the 'unsolvability' of the problem...what is the solution you suggest? teach yoga to all the men in the world? (and also for that matter all the women?) oh sure you can whack a couple of guys trying to rape a couple of women (don't get me wrong here...whenever that can be done it should be done...males who cant perform an adequate courting dance should not be allowed to mate). But as long as we are where we are the mentality will continue..so don't blame me for having some Utopian dreams which i know cant be achieved
@anwesha: everyone is an imposter...we all get thrown out...men first...and what was the mistake? we newspaper subs are not as clean as you publishing editors
i dont particularly enjoy being as clean...subs sound slightly more interesting...although you might differ
however, 'vison' would be one
and the other one would be 'sub-serviant' (that is the one for which i wrote the 'intended' thing)
Ah...the first one is a typo and the other thing happened cos our paper stylesheet says hyphen after sub...got so used to it that ends up using it in every word with sub in it ..:)
a revloutionary post!
New post please!
Post a Comment